FOI revealed LNG’s use of Spare Flare due to ongoing defect in flare stack

FORT ST. JOHN, B.C. — LNG Canada has been using its emergency spare flare as its largest source of flaring in March. 

According to a release by My Sea to Sky dated May 12th, freedom of information (FOI) requests revealed that an ongoing operation defect with LNG Canada’s flare stack in Kitimat has cracked the facility’s flare tip. 

This comes after the Kitimat facility was issued an order by the British Columbia Energy Regulator on April 22nd, following an inspection that revealed at least two instances of non-compliance with the company’s permit, which limits black smoke emissions. 

Spare flares are used during “emergency” or “upset” scenarios, meaning these emissions are not regulated by permits. 

The release said that according to the company and its permit, LNG Canada is “is currently in the regular ‘operations’ phase,” the release said. 

Even though the company’s largest flaring by volume happened during the emergency spare flare, the facility’s cold/dry and storage/loading flares exceeded the permitted volumes in March: 

• The facility’s cold/dry flare is at an average monthly rate of 29.7 cubic metres per minute against the permit limit of 9.6 cubic metres per minute. 
• The storage/loading flare’s monthly average rate was 40.3 cubic metres per minute, against the permit’s limit of 6.0 cubic metres per minute. 

Tim Doty, former technical air expert at the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), current Technical Advisor to the Texas-based nonprofit Oilfield Witness, and president of TCHD Consulting, said he has spent three days in Kitimat conducting an optical gas imaging (OGI) field assessment of LNG Canada. 

“During this monitoring project, I documented significant and sometimes massive uncombusted and partially combusted emissions being released from multiple exhaust stacks and a damaged and malfunctioning flare that was not being operated as designed and represented,” Doty said. 

He added that the emissions filled the airshed with pollution “over and beyond” the company’s property line. 

“[The pollution] would be expected to negatively impact the adjacent community and downwind receptors, pending meteorological conditions,” he added. “I have personally performed OGI assessments at most of the operational LNG plants in both Texas and Louisiana over the last several years, and I can honestly say that I was shocked by what I documented at LNG Canada.” 

My Sea To Sky’s executive director, Tracey Saxby, believes the industry is operating unsafely in Canada. 

My Sea to Sky is an environmental organization founded in 2014 to defend, protect and restore Átl’ḵa7tsem / Howe Sound. 

“Governments are allowing that to happen at the expense of human health. This is an emerging public health crisis,” she said. 

“[The federal government]  needs to step in and issue a stop‑work order to LNG Canada, which has been spewing unregulated toxic chemicals into residential areas and exceeding its flaring permits by up to 40 times.” 

She added that the issues have persisted for close to a year. 

“If this is the precedent oil and gas majors are setting for LNG in Canada, imagine what will happen with smaller, less experienced companies like Western LNG’s Ksi Lisims project or Woodfibre LNG,” Saxby said. 

According to a news article by The Globe and Mail on April 9th, the facility flared an average of 40 times more gas than its permit allows, both warm/wet and cold/dry flares, during the last three months of 2025 and the first month of 2026. 

Energeticcity.ca reached out to LNG Canada for a comment, but did not hear back in time for publication.