Advertisement

(Opinion) ‘Replace the Taylor Bridge, B.C. can’t afford to wait’

Chris Gardner, president and CEO of ICBA, is urging the B.C. provincial government to replace the Taylor Bridge. ICBA represents more than 4,500 member companies across British Columbia and Alberta.

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
ICBA president and CEO, Chris Gardner. (ICBA)

TAYLOR, B.C. — A 65-year-old steel bridge is barely holding together the Peace River corridor and economy – and it’s only getting more expensive to replace it.

Last year, ICBA (Independent Contractors and Businesses Association) filed a Freedom of Information request for the inspection reports on the Taylor Bridge in northeast B.C.

What finally came back this week, after a nine-month wait, was concerning. Cracked floor stringers that have been field-welded, re-cracked, and field-welded again. Gusset plates – the steel connection nodes that hold the entire truss together – with confirmed material loss from decades of corrosion. A coating system described by the government’s own engineers as “failed and in poor condition.”

Advertisement

Local News Straight

to Your Phone

Download our app today!

Available on Android and iOS devices

This is not just any bridge. The Taylor Bridge carries Highway 97 across the Peace River and is the backbone of northeastern B.C.’s economy. The region produces natural gas, oil, forestry products and has some of the province’s most productive agricultural land.

A screenshot of the Taylor Bridge with vehicles on it and a sunset/rise in the background.
The Taylor Bridge. (Ministry of Transportation and Infrastructure, YouTube.)

The Site C dam isn’t far away. Every load of grain, every oversized energy sector haul, every supply truck headed to a northern community crosses this bridge.

If the Taylor Bridge closes or is restricted, it turns a one-hour trip between Dawson Creek and Fort St. John into a three-plus hour trek adding 175 more kilometres.

Advertisement

The reports imply the government is leaning toward rehabilitation rather than replacement. ICBA believes that is the wrong call.

The concrete substructure is sound – that’s not in dispute. But the steel superstructure is like a patient in active decline waiting to see a specialist.

The fatigue cracks keep appearing at new locations no matter how many are drilled and welded. The coating has failed, lead-based paint is on nearly every tested surface and the original design included no sacrificial steel allowance – meaning every millimetre of corrosion eats directly into structural margin with no buffer.

The government’s own engineers note the structure will need “additional steel added” just to make rehabilitation viable. 

A new bridge built to modern standards would serve northern B.C. for 75 years. Every year of reactive maintenance – more stringer welds, more gusset reinforcements, more hazmat recoating – drives the rehabilitation cost higher while the service life gets shorter.

The government owes the Peace region a replacement, a timeline and a commitment.

We’ve seen what delaying the inevitable looks like. The George Massey Tunnel opened in Delta/Richmond in 1959, one year before the Taylor Bridge. Its replacement was designed, permitted and ready to build in 2017 – with bids as low as $2.6 billion.

One of the first decisions of a newly elected NDP government was to cancel this project. Today, nine years later, the project still doesn’t have an environmental assessment certificate.

The official budget is nominally $4.15 billion, a pre-pandemic estimate the government’s own minister has effectively conceded is out of date – we suspect it could more than double.

A crossing that could have opened in 2022 won’t open until 2030 at the earliest.

This has become a 30-year project defined by so many starts and stops that someone who was riding in a baby car seat when talk of replacing the Massey started will be in their 30s when they finally use the new crossing.  

Budget 2026 introduced a new spin on the NDP’s approach to building infrastructure projects: “re-pacing.”

Finance Minister Brenda Bailey used it to explain delaying construction of long-term care facilities, hospitals and student housing. 

Here’s the problem. You can only “re-pace” a project that was “paced” in the first place. The Taylor Bridge replacement has never been included in any budget.

What we have is an old bridge being held together by field welds while engineers work toward “identifying a preferred course of action.”

The collapse in B.C.’s finances make it worse. Premier David Eby has presided over a shocking explosion in government spending and debt.

The Ministry of Finance forecasts a structural deficit of $12-13 billion per year and $13.3 billion next year – the largest in B.C. history. Taxpayer-supported debt is heading toward 37.4 per cent of GDP by 2028-29.

Spending to pay the interest on all this debt is now Victoria’s third largest expenditure after healthcare and education. Put plainly, the cupboard is bare.  

Still, ICBA’s ask is simple: replace the Taylor Bridge, don’t rehabilitate it. Building infrastructure is not just another government program and delay is not fiscal prudence.   

Over the past generation, Canada and B.C. have unenviable track records of dithering and delay on approving and building major projects.

We need a focus on execution and delivery at a time when the strategic imperative to invest in infrastructure, capitalize on our energy and resource advantage, and get our goods to markets faster, has never been greater.

The Taylor Bridge doesn’t have another decade to wait for a decision and neither do the communities in the Peace.

Stay connected with local news

Make us your

home page

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor should be exclusive to Energeticcity.ca. Include your name, address and daytime phone number. Keep letters to 500 words or fewer. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. To submit a letter by e-mail to contact@energeticcity.ca.

Close the CTA